MIDLIFE [FREEDOM]-19, Friday, December 22, 2023 - This is a Time to Celebrate American Freedom.
Had then candidate Trump not won the 2016 Election, President … cough, cough … Hillary Clinton would have packed the Supreme Court with Soros-funded radicals, and American freedom would have died in America after her 2017 … cough, cough … inauguration.
Even this AP reporting is a propaganda hit piece, written in the negative, while exposing special counsel Jack Smith's blatant intent in black and white.
"WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Friday it will not immediately take up a plea by special counsel Jack Smith to rule on whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted for his actions to overturn the 2020 election results.
"The ruling is a win for Trump and his lawyers, who have sought repeatedly to delay this and other criminal cases against him as he seeks to reclaim the White House in 2024. It averts a swift ruling from the nation's highest court that could have definitively turned aside his claims of immunity and pushed the case toward a trial scheduled to start on March 4.
"[...].
"Smith had pressed the Supreme Court to intervene, citing significant public interest in a speedy resolution to the case. The request to leapfrog the appeals court, which Smith himself acknowledged was 'extraordinary,' underscored prosecutors' concerns that the legal fight over the issue could delay the start of Trump’s trial beyond next year’s presidential election" (1.).
***
- reported, "The ruling is a win for Trump and his lawyers, who have sought repeatedly to delay this and other criminal cases against him as he seeks to reclaim the White House in 2024" (1.).
- meaning, yes, Trump’s repeated attempt to not allow Democrats to interfere in the 2024 Election, has resulted in a win.
- reported, "It averts a swift ruling from the nation's highest court that could have definitively turned aside his claims of immunity and pushed the case toward a trial scheduled to start on March 4" (1.).
- meaning, yes, the Court rejected Democrat's blatant attempt to interfere in the 2024 Election, by rejecting the claim to accelerate proceedings.
- reported, "Smith had pressed the Supreme Court to intervene, citing significant public interest in a speedy resolution to the case" (1.).
- meaning, yes, Smith pressed the Court to forgo the Constitutional rights of an individual American on the non-basis of “significant public interest,” and interfere in the 2024 Election. The rights of the accused are at stake, not that of the American people. The American people are not on trial.
- reported, "The request to leapfrog the appeals court, which Smith himself acknowledged was 'extraordinary,' underscored prosecutors' concerns that the legal fight over the issue could delay the start of Trump’s trial beyond next year’s presidential election" (1.).
- meaning, ditto on my last. It was clear that the intent of Smith, and Democrats, was to interfere in the 2024 Election, and now, at least on this matter, the attempt has been categorically rejected.
***
This is a time to celebrate American freedom.
- Matfucius
1.) https://www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-says-no-now-193543952.html
COMMENTS