MIDLIFE CRISIS-19, Friday, August 04, 2023 - "January 6th" Was a False-Flag "Insurrection" Orchestrated in Order to Stop the Objecting to Electors.
After debate began following the first State objection to Arizona's Electors, "both chambers were forced into an emergency recess while the building was locked down" (1.).
Mission accomplished ...
***
Let us start with a couple of history lessons on objecting to Electors after a presidential election.
"If there is an objection to an elector or electors on January 6, 2021, there is a recent precedent. In January 2005, Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones [D-OH] and Senator Barbara Boxer [D-CA] objected to Ohio’s electoral votes for George W. Bush [R-TX], alleging 'they were not in all known circumstances regularly given.' The House and Senate met separately as required and using a roll call vote the objections were widely rejected. The House denied the objection in 31-267 vote, and the Senate denied it in a 1-74 vote" (1.).
***
"The Electoral Count Act of 1887 and several federal statutes address questions about contested electors that land in Congress. The Congressional Research Service’s current interpretation of the Electoral Count Act explains its understanding of the process when it comes to objections to electoral votes.
"'Objections to individual state returns must be made in writing by at least one Member each of the Senate and House of Representatives. If an objection meets these requirements, the joint session recesses and the two houses separate and debate the question in their respective chambers for a maximum of two hours,' the CRS said. 'The two houses then vote separately to accept or reject the objection. They then reassemble in joint session, and announce the results of their respective votes. An objection to a state’s electoral vote must be approved by both houses in order for any contested votes to be excluded'” (1.).
***
"Objections at that meeting ['The session on January 6, 2021 starts at 1 p.m.'] about electors will be settled using a process established by the Electoral Count Act of 1887. The law has its origins in the contested presidential election of 1876 between Samuel Tilden and Rutherford B. Hayes. Several states during the 1876 election sent rival electoral ballots to be considered by Congress, which lacked a procedure to decide among contested slates of electors. The short-term solution was a special 15-person commission (including five House Representatives, five Senators, and five Supreme Court justices) to decide the election, which went to Hayes. In the end, the participating Supreme Court justices cast the deciding votes, after the House and Senate members voted on party lines" (1.).
***
That is the historical basis for what was intended to take place, based on what were Constitutional and planned Republican Electoral objections regarding the November 2020 Presidential Election. There was no attempt to "overturn" the Election, but there was a legal and planned attempt to object to Electors based on the underlying question of election integrity.
"The next public step in the 2020 presidential election will happen on January 6, 2021, when Congress meets to validate the election. If there are objections at that meeting, a formerly obscure law will be consulted to settle disputes about electors, [the Electoral Count Act of 1887].
So what happened, what did take place, why was not the 2020 Presidential Election challenged by Republicans - as planned - in Congress, before the American people, and on live national daytime television - including the presenting of evidence regarding allegations of election fraud?
Enter, another history lesson.
"Heading into Wednesday's joint session of Congress [January 06, 2021] to tally the Electoral College vote results, lawmakers anticipated a long day peppered with objections hinged on baseless allegations of election fraud. More than a dozen Republican senators had said they would object to at least one state's election results.
[Note to Self: This NPR reporter, Barbara Sprunt, Reference (2.), falsely stated that the allegations were "baseless," and conveniently left out of her above statement - later reported at the end of her own article - that there were one-hundred and twenty-one (121) Republican House Members who challenged, objected to, the Arizona Electors. The allegations were not baseless, they were stifled from being thoroughly heard, again. The allegations were not subject to the Congressional debate planned, nor were they subject to the national public scrutiny anticipated. That is what Democrats feared, that is why the disruptive events of January 6th were orchestrated.]
"They began with a debate over a challenge to Arizona's results. But after pro-Trump extremists brought violence and chaos to the Capitol, both chambers were forced into an emergency recess while the building was locked down.
"When lawmakers reconvened hours later, a number of Senate Republicans abandoned their plan to cast objections" (2.).
Wait, what? "[...] a number of Senate Republicans abandoned their plan to cast objections" (2.).
Summary, the planned disruptive events of Wednesday, January 06, 2021, benefited Democrats by not only shutting down the very first State objection to Electors in Arizona, it shuttered other Senators from later casting their objections, including objecting to Electors in other states, when the proceedings resumed that night when most Americans would be asleep.
Then and ever since, Democrats in coordination with the main stream media, under an ongoing propaganda campaign, have vilified anyone who questions the integrity of the 2020 Election as a "racist," "white supremacist," and or an "insurrectionist," thus pushing rational thought, historical facts, debate, and the Constitutional validity of what was intended to take place that day, into the dustbin of history.
Conspiracy? No, read a fact.
The integrity of the 2020 Presidential Election was irrefutably in question, but those questions were repeatedly silenced. Fact.
***
"January 6th" was a false-flag "insurrection" orchestrated in order to stop the objecting to Electors.
- Matfucius
1.) https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/explaining-how-congress-settles-electoral-college-disputes
2.) https://www.npr.org/sections/insurrection-at-the-capitol/2021/01/07/954380156/here-are-the-republicans-who-objected-to-the-electoral-college-count
COMMENTS